Thursday, 19 of October of 2017

Tag » injuries

CDC Data Reveals Marked Increase of A.D.H.D. Diagnosis in Children

By Mark Favaloro,Virginia Medical Malpractice Injury Lawyer

The CDC has released new statistics that show a sharp increase in children being diagnosed with A.D.H.D. That diagnosis is typically treated with strong drugs such as Ritalin and Adderall. Many in the medical community are concerned that these medications are being overused. To learn more, read here. . .

New CDC Data Reveals One in Five High-School Age Boys Diagnosed with A.D.H.D.

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis, Appleton & Favaloro include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Attorneys with our firm have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. Attorneys with our personal injury law firm have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of practicing attorneys receive.

 



Da Vinci Robot Injury Information

By Jim Lewis,Virginia Medical Malpractice Injury Attorney

Our firm published an article on the disturbing sales techniques used by sales representatives for the da Vinci surgical procedure robot. Many doctors were pressured to use the da Vinci robot, even when many had very little training with the device. To learn more, check out the article here…

Aggressive Da Vinci Robot Sales Reps May Have Contributed to Patient Injuries

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis, Appleton & Favaloro include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Attorneys with our firm have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. Attorneys with our personal injury law firm have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of practicing attorneys receive.


New Report Squashes Myths Surrounding Medical Malpractice

By Jim Lewis, Medical Malpractice Injury Lawyer

Our firm published an article discussing the five most-common myths surrounding medical malpractice. Unfortunately, these myths have infiltrated media outlets, newspapers, and the medical community, which has led to tort reform laws getting passed in a myriad of states. The article explains how this is unproductive and will not help reduce health-care spending or improve the health-care system in our country…

Medical Malpractice Myths Debunked

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis, Appleton & Favaloro include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Attorneys with our firm have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. Attorneys with our personal injury law firm have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of practicing attorneys receive.

 


Serious Medical Malpractice “Never Events” Occur 80 Times a Week

By Jim Lewis, Medical Malpractice Lawyer in Virginia

Our firm published an article on so-called “never events”. These are events that occur during a surgical procedure that are considered unacceptable and an exemplar of medical negligence. For example, leaving a sponge inside a patient’s body. Unfortunately, these events are occurring quite frequently each week in the United States. To learn more, read the story here…

Medical Malpractice Alert – So-Called “Never Events” Happen Quite Frequently in Hospitals

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis, Appleton & Favaloro include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Attorneys with our firm have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. Attorneys with our personal injury law firm have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of practicing attorneys receive.


Attorney Talks About Unfair Tort Reform Laws

By Jim Lewis, Medical Negligence Injury Lawyer

Texas is an example of how not to address tort laws. The legislature passed a sweeping tort reform package in 2003 which made it more difficult for injured victims to file legitimate claims and capped non-economic damages that an injured victim could receive from a medical malpractice injury claim to only $250,000. To learn why Texas is a terrible model for Virginia and other states, read the story here…

Texas Tort Reform Laws NOT the Model for Virginia Tort Law

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis, Appleton & Favaloro include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Attorneys with our firm have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. Attorneys with our personal injury law firm have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of practicing attorneys receive.


Concerns Raised about Blood Thinner Xarelto

By Jim Lewis, VA/NC Medical Malpractice Attorney

What Happened:

Federal drug regulators have received a number of reports involving blood clots associated with the new anticoagulant Xarelto, a surprising twist given that other blood thinners such as Pradaxa have been more often associated with episodes of uncontrolled bleeding.

Xarelto (rivaroxaban) was introduced to the market by Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen Pharmaceuticals in July of 2011 and the drug was billed as a superior alternative to warfarin for prevention of blood clots in certain cases, as patients who use the new drug are supposed to require less monitoring.

Another drug from the same class, Pradaxa, was introduced in October 2010 and since has been linked to a shocking number of severe bleeding events, hemorrhages and deaths. Since its introduction, Pradaxa has become one of the medications most often associated with adverse events according to FDA reports.

Last month the Institute for Safe Medication Practices released their QuarterWatch Report, which uncovered a number of alarming reports revealing problems with Xarelto. The new report indicates that there have been at least 356 adverse event reports submitted to the FDA during the first quarter of 2012 alone. This represents a doubling of the number of reports submitted to the agency about the drug in the final quarter of 2011.

Unlike Pradaxa, the most common problem with Xarelto is not uncontrolled bleeding, but instead serious blood clots. The risk is especially pronounced among patients under the age of 66, many of whom were taking the drug after hip or knee surgery. The FDA received 158 reports about the drug associated with blood clots during the first three months of the year. The big problem is, of course, that this is the precise event the drug has been designed to prevent.

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, has told reporters that the high number of blood clot reports were simply a function of how well the drug was doing commercially. Sadly, the popularity appears to be coming at a high cost to innocent consumers.

The Virginia Injury Lawyer’s Perspective:

Given the recent studies showing the risks of Xarelto, it’s surprising that the drug is still being marketed to patients. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured by a dangerous or defective drug, you should contact an experienced VA personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. Attorneys with our Virginia personal injury law firm have helped many victims of dangerous and defective drugs recover damages from companies whose negligence or disregard for consumer safety led to injuries.

Helpful Info:

If you or a family member has been injured by a defective or dangerous drug, you can begin to learn about your legal rights and options by reading this article.

Have Questions?

We maintain a library of attorneys’ answers to frequently asked questions regarding defective or dangerous drugs.

CA

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Rick Shapiro and James Lewis have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. They, along with fellow attorney Randy Appleton, have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of outstanding attorneys receive.


Recent Study Warns About Metal Hip Implant Dangers

By Rick Shapiro, Virginia Medical Malpractice Lawyer

A new study shows that all-metal hip implants can release particles of cobalt into a patient’s bloodstream, possibly leading to terrible medical problems down the road. To learn more, read the full story here…

“Study Offers More Bad News For Virginians With All-Metal Hip Implants”

CA

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Rick Shapiro and James Lewis have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. They, along with fellow attorney Randy Appleton, have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of outstanding attorneys receive.


Warnings about dangers of all-metal hips have been around for a while

By Kevin Duffan, Medical Malpractice Lawyer

What Happened:

According to a new report UK regulators were aware of problems associated with the all-metal implants long before they were ever recalled.

According to a report by the news site Wales Online, problems with metal-on-metal hip implants have been around since at least 2007, which is when regulators in Australia first uncovered the issues associated with the devices. The first recall was announced in 2009 by the Australian government. A larger, worldwide recall was not issued until August of 2010, a delay which may have caused injury to countless patients who were not aware of the trouble they could be facing down the road.

A report on the Regulation of Medical Implants in the EU and UK by the Science and Technology Committee leveled serious criticisms against the British Ministry of Health for delaying action against the dangerous metal-on-metal devices. The report pointed out that many people knew of the damage all-metal implants could cause and yet the government failed to take action as early as other countries, a delay that caused citizens to suffer needlessly. The same issue could be raised against American regulators, given that the FDA allowed the device to continue to be sold and implanted in patients for years after the first concerns were raised about their effectiveness.

The DePuy ASR was finally recalled due to poor performance in a large number of patients. The problem with the implant is that as it is used, tiny pieces of metal fragments are released into a patient’s blood stream. These pieces of metal contain cobalt and chromium that are absorbed into the blood and nearby tissues. The damage this can do has not been fully understood, but reports indicate it can cause muscle, bone and even neurological damage.

Though the recall began with the DePuy device, studies indicate that the problem applies to an entire class of all-metal implant products. Earlier this year the FDA asked all manufacturers to conduct a study of their metal-on-metal products to assess their long-term safety. Experts have recommended that those with the devices already implanted should undergo annual physicals and imagining scans to detect any bone lose or tissue damage. Patients are also advised to screen for metal ions in their blood.

The Virginia Injury Lawyer’s Perspective:

About one million of these all-metal devices have been implanted in patients across the world over the past 15 years. This means that far too many patients are at possible risk of the dangerous effects of cobalt exposure.

The manufacturers that created these all-metal implants that have caused harm to patients should be held responsible for their actions. Some companies, such as DePuy Orthopaedics, Stryker, Zimmer, Biomet and Wright Medical Technology have already begun recalls to try and stop their products from causing further harm. Attorneys with our Virginia personal injury law firm have helped many victims of dangerous and defective products recover damages from companies whose negligence or disregard for consumer safety led to injuries.

Helpful Info: 

If you or a family member has been injured by a defective or dangerous product, you can begin to learn about your legal rights and options by reading this article.

Got Questions?

We maintain a library of attorneys’ answers to frequently asked questions regarding recalled products.

CA

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Rick Shapiro and James Lewis have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. They, along with fellow attorney Randy Appleton, have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of outstanding attorneys receive.


Women at Increased Risk of Trouble in Hip Resurfacing

By Jim Lewis, Medical Malpractice Lawyer

What Happened:

Last month a respected medical journal, The Lancet, published a new study revealing higher failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing when compared with conventional total hip replacement (THR). Shockingly, the failure rates were up to six times higher compared with more traditional techniques.

First, a little bit of explanation is needed to understand the difference between hip resurfacing and a total hip replacement. In hip resurfacing, the surgeon reshapes the pelvic ball or head and then places a metal cap over the newly shaped head. Then the surgeon places a metal cup on the inside of the pelvic socket or cup, which is supposed to allow that joint to function smoothly.

With a THR, the surgeon removes the entire hip joint and replaces it with an artificial joint consisting of a femoral head that is attached to a femoral stem that is drilled into the upper thighbone and a plastic liner that goes between the ball and the socket.

The Lancet revealed that in 55-year-old women, the revision rates were 8.3% for resurfaced hips and only 1.5% for THRs with metal-on-polyethylene implants, according to the study. Meanwhile in 55-year-old men, the revisions rates were 4.1% for resurfaced hips and 1.9% for THRs with metal-on-polyethylene implants.

One surgeon who took part in this study noted that the failure rates in women were unacceptably high and that, as a result, the panel recommended that resurfacing not be undertaken in women. The surgeon further noted that due to the higher failure rate of the procedure in men, preoperative measures should be used to fully assess the suitability for male patients.

The fact that the study involved failure rates of metal-on-polyethylene THR implants is critically important because of the overwhelming evidence that indicates that metal-on-metal THR implants also suffer abnormally high failure rates. For example, earlier this year The Lancet published yet another study showing that all-metal hip implants failed at an increased rate than other types of hip implants, with a five-year revision rate of 6.2%. This compared with 2.3% for ceramic-on-ceramic implants and 1.7% for metal-on-plastic types.

Some manufacturers of these all-metal implants have already recalled certain devices and are the subject of a number of lawsuits. Manufacturers include DePuy Orthopaedics, Stryker, Zimmer, Biomet and Wright Medical Technology.

The Virginia Injury Lawyer’s Perspective:

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured by a dangerous or defective product, particularly a metal-on-metal hip implant, you should contact an experienced Virginia personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. There is a finite period of time to take legal action against those responsible for manufacturing the device and once the statute of limitations expires, you are barred from seeking compensation.

Attorneys with our Virginia personal injury law firm have helped many victims of dangerous and defective products recover damages from companies whose negligence or disregard for consumer safety led to injuries.

Helpful Info:

If you or a family member has been injured by a defective or dangerous product, you can begin to learn about your legal rights and options by reading this article.

Have Questions?

We maintain a library of attorneys’ answers to frequently asked questions regarding recalled products.

CA

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Rick Shapiro and James Lewis have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. They, along with fellow attorney Randy Appleton, have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of outstanding attorneys receive.


FDA Takes Heat for Fast-Tracking Pradaxa

By Mark Favaloro, Medical Malpractice Lawyer

What Happened:

In a recent article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), researchers reviewed the safety records of Pradaxa, as well as several other drugs that received approval under one of the FDA expedited approval programs designed to fast-track certain drugs to the market. According to the researchers, Pradaxa, multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya, and thyroid cancer drug Caprelsa, each “raise the question of whether it was good policy to approve three innovative new drugs with significant safety questions unanswered and with optimal doses not determined.”

The researchers specifically mentioned the bleeding risk associated with Pradaxa, as well as its lack of an antidote, and said that bleeding in patients taking the blood thinner may be harder to treat than bleeds related to the older blood thinner warfarin. The article concluded that Pradaxa raised enough concern that the drug should have been subject to stricter scrutiny than the speedy approval by the FDA.

The researchers claim that Pradaxa, which is used to reduce the risk of stroke and blood clots in patients with atrial fibrillation, went through priority review and was thus fast-tracked by the FDA. According to the FDA, the purpose of the fast-track process is to introduce important, new medications to patients more quickly.

Unlike warfarin, Pradaxa does not require weekly doctor check-ups and dietary restrictions and was seen as the first replacement of the difficult-to-use blood thinner. Since its introduction into the market, however, Pradaxa has been at the center of a storm regarding reports of serious bleeding. In 2011 alone, the drug was responsible for 3,781 adverse events reports, more than any other drug monitored by the FDA.

The Virginia Injury Lawyer’s Perspective:

Since the news of the negative affects of the drug came to light, Pradaxa has been in the spotlight as dozens of lawsuits have been filed against the drug’s manufacturer, Boehringer Ingelheim. Sickened Virginia patients have alleged that the drug led to serious and even fatal bleeding, a problem that they say they were never properly warned about.

Given the recent studies showing the downsides of Pradaxa, it’s a wonder that the drug is still being marketed to patients. If you or a loved one has been seriously injured by a dangerous or defective drug, you should contact an experienced VA personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. Attorneys with our Virginia personal injury law firm have helped many victims of dangerous and defective drugs recover damages from companies whose negligence or disregard for consumer safety led to injuries.

Helpful Info:

If you or a family member has been injured by a defective or dangerous drug, you can begin to learn about your legal rights and options by reading this article.

Have Questions?

We maintain a library of attorneys’ answers to frequently asked questions regarding defective or dangerous drugs.

CA

About the Editors: The VA-NC medical malpractice attorneys at Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton include medical and surgical malpractice lawyers licensed in both Virginia and Carolina. Our attorneys have experience handling medical malpractice cases involving hospital and doctors’ mistakes, as well as nursing home abuse and neglect. Check out our case results to see our track record of success in medical malpractice lawsuits, and also be sure to read our free medical malpractice reports Top 10 Tips From a Medical Malpractice Insider and Top 5 Surgical Errors. Rick Shapiro and James Lewis have been listed among the Best Lawyers in America since 2008. They, along with fellow attorney Randy Appleton, have also been named Virginia Super Lawyers since 2010, an honor fewer than 5 percent of outstanding attorneys receive.